Credits:
In this article let us have a look at 2 very popular distros Manjaro and antiX and see where each distro shines so that you can pick one that best suit your needs!
For those of you in a hurry, here is the short version of the answer.
antiX The Short Version Of The Answer
What are the differences between Manjaro and antiX? The main difference between Manjaro and antiX is Manjaro is meant for users who are looking for the best gaming distro while antiX is meant for advanced users who need a lightweight USB portable distro
The table below highlights the important differences between the 2 distros
Manjaro | antiX | |
Organization Name | Manjaro GmbH & Co. KG Organization Type: Company |
antiX is developed by a community, to fulfill the need for a lightweight USB portable and stable distro, capable of running in older hardware.
Organization Type: Community |
Expertise Level Needed | Beginner – Intermediate | Intermediate |
Based On | Arch | Debian |
Target Use-cases | General-purpose Distro.
Best Use-case: best suited for running Windows apps and Games through WINE and proton Other use cases: Arch lovers can get a “prebuilt easy to install” distro |
Specific purpose Distro.
Best Use-case: USB portable Distro Other Use-cases: For use in older hardware |
Software Support | 8/10 Out of the box software: 4/5 Software Repository: 4/5 Since this distro is based on Arch, there is support for all the latest software and kernels. |
8/10 Out of the box software: 4/5 Software Repository: 4/5 |
Hardware Support | 8/10 Official driver support: 3/5 Support for older hardware: 5/5 The user can select whether to use opensource drivers or proprietary drivers at boot-time |
9/10 Official driver support: 4/5 Support for older hardware: 5/5 |
Hardware Resource Needs | middleweight | Lightweight |
Support | 7/10 Paid support: Available in certain areas Community: 3/5 The community will expect you to have a DIY attitude and make an attempt to solve your problems using documentation, before posting in their forums. Documentation: 4/5 Arch documentation is considered to be one of the best in the Linux distro world! |
4/10 Paid support: Not available Community: 2/5 Documentation: 2/5 |
Ease of use | 7/10 Medium | 7/10 Intermediate level |
Stability | 7/10 As long as the best practices are followed the Distro is stable. A tinkering user can break the system if he doesn’t know what he is doing! |
8/10: Very stable
Based on Debian Stable and hence Antix Linux is a very stable distro! |
Release Cycles | Rolling Release cycles: The software packages are constantly upgraded with features and bugs fixes as they become available, so no need to wait for major releases for getting the benefits of new software packages. | Fixed Release
Once a year |
The graph below summarizes the table and compares the 2 distros and shows us how they compare with each other on various factors (Higher the points the better that particular feature is in a given distro)
That is just the short version of the answer, let’s go ahead and look at the longer and more informative version and learn more about the similarities and differences between the 2 distros.
The Linux Distributions World
The word Distro is short for “Distribution”. Since the Linux source code is open for everyone to see, large communities started evolving to bring together Operating Systems suited towards specific needs/goals.
These “specific needs/goals” include, but not limited to the following.
- producing documents
- writing programs and creating software
- editing pictures, videos, audio, and multimedia-production related works
- store sensitive information by securing the operating system so that no one can hack into it or
- just browse the internet and consume media.
Say a community of people just wanted to browse the internet with their computers, then there is no point giving them the software to write programs in. Thus since every community’s needs and goals were different these communities started distributing built images of this operating system with all the essential tools installed. These prebuilt images are called distros!
If you wish to know more about the reason behind the presence of so many choices in the Linux World, I suggest reading the article given below.
Reasons Behind The Existence of SO MANY Linux Distros: An Analysis!
The Main Factors of Comparison
The factors mentioned above are just a small list of 100s of factors that differentiate distros. If you are either switching from some other OS to Linux or you are in the process of choosing your next Linux distro and you are confused which one to choose, you need to have a look at these top 5 decision-making factors
- Factor#1: Good Match with your Particular use-case
- Factor#2: Support for your favorite software
- Factor#3: Hardware Support and Proprietary Driver Support
- Factor#4: Your level of expertise in Linux
- Factor#5: Hardware Resource Needs
I have written a separate article explaining these factors which you can find in the link below
Top 5 Factors To Choose Between Linux Distros!
Let’s have a look at each of these important factors and see how Manjaro and antiX compare against each other.
Factor#1: Good Match with your Particular use-case
By use-case, I mean the type of work you are going to be doing on your computer. The Linux distro world originated because of the difference in use cases.
Manjaro’s goal is wildly different from that of antiX’s.
Let’s have a brief comparison betweenManjaro and antiX in terms of goals, target users, and best use cases to employ these distros.
Manjaro | antiX | |
Goal | To be an “easy to install, configure and use” version of Arch Linux | To be a lightweight distro with USB portability |
Target users | Linux enthusiasts who want an “easy to customize” system. | Users who need a lightweight Debian based USB portable distro |
Best Use Cases to Employ the Distro | Best Use-case: having a prebuilt Arch-based distro Other Use-cases: Running Windows apps, Gaming |
Best Use-case: USB portable Distro
Other Use-cases: For use in older hardware |
Factor#2: Support for your favorite software
If your main work involves some specific software or the latest versions of a given software then that becomes a decision-making factor for choosing a Linux Distribution. So before fixing on a given distro, be sure to google if that distro has official support for your main software needs.
The factors you need to be considering include the following
* Out of the Box support: The software that the distro ships with.
* Repository Support: The curated software that is available on the official repos
* Type of release cycle: This decides the trade-off between up-to-date software and stable tested software.
* Availability of Graphical Software managers
* Package manager used: This can decide the ease of which you can install and uninstall software
Let’s see how Manjaro and antiX fair up against each other in the category of Software support
Manjaro | antiX | |
Out of the Box Software | 4/5: The regular version comes with all the basic tools needed. | 4/5: Has a lot of lightweight apps preinstalled |
Repository Support | 4/5: Very good.
Has its own official repo, also has support for Arch repos. |
4/5: good repository support as this distro is based on Debian |
Type of release cycle | Rolling release
The software packages are constantly upgraded with features and bugs fixes as they become available, so no need to wait for major releases for getting the benefits of new software packages. |
Fixed Release
About once a year |
GUI Tools | Pamac GUI tool available | Available:
Package Installer |
Package manager used | Pacman | APT |
The bar chart below summarizes the table above. As you can see, both antiX and Manjaro got the same points in terms of Out of the box software support. Both antiX and Manjaro got the same points in terms of Repository support.
Hence, this round is a tie between antiX and Manjaro!!
Refer to the article below if you wish to learn more about package managers.
A Beginners Introduction To Linux Package managers: apt, yum, dpkg & rpm
Factor#3: Hardware Support and Proprietary Driver Support
Not all Linux distros support proprietary drivers officially. Depending on your computer’s hardware, you may or may not have open-source driver support from the manufacturers. This is especially true for hardware such as graphics cards and network cards. Hence it is a good idea to take “driver support” into consideration while choosing your next distro.
The factors you need to be considering include the following
* Distro’s Policy of use of opensource vs proprietary 3rd party software
* Official driver support by Major Companies
* 3rd party driver support from official repos
* Support for older hardware
Manjaro | antiX | |
Distro’s Policy | The choice is given to the end-user, either free or proprietary software can be chosen for use. | Proprietary drivers officially supported |
Official driver support by Major Companies | 3/5: Hardware and Software Companies don’t officially release Drivers for Manjaro and Arch Linux as the user base is not as big as Ubuntu and Fedora. | 4/5: Since this distro is based on Debian, all the official support is also inherited! |
3rd party driver support | Available | available |
Support for older hardware | 5/5: Supports both 32 and 64-bit processors and has good driver support for older hardware like network cards and graphics cards.
Also supports automatic hardware detection! |
5/5 Supports both 32 and 64-bit processors and has good driver support for older hardware like network cards and graphics cards. Also supports automatic hardware detection! |
The bar chart below summarizes the table above. As you can see, antiX is better than Manjaro when it comes to official driver support. Both antiX and Manjaro got the same points in terms of support for Older Hardware.
Hence, antiX wins the round of Hardware support!
Refer to the article below if you wish to have a look at some of the top distros in terms of hardware support.
Best Distro For Software And Hardware Support: A Comparison!!
Factor#4: Your level of expertise in Linux
Depending on your level of expertise in Linux, the choice of the distro you need will vary. This is because of the following factors
* Ease of use: beginner, intermediate, expert
* Paid customer support: available, not available
* Online community support: great, good, okay, not good, no support
* Available Documentation: Great documentation, Good documentation, Okay documentation, no documentation
Let’s see the level of support available for Manjaro and antiX and see how they compare against each other
Manjaro | antiX | |
Ease of Use | Intermediate to advanced | Intermediate |
Paid Customer Support | Available in certain areas | Not available |
Online Community Support | 3/5: okay
The community will expect you to have a DIY attitude and make an attempt to solve your problems using documentation, before posting in their forums. |
2/5 small community |
Documentation | 5/5: Great documentation
Arch documentation is considered to be one of the best in the Linux distro world! |
2/5 Okay documentation |
The bar chart below summarizes the table above. As you can see, Manjaro is better than antiX in terms of online community support. Manjaro is better than antiX in terms of Documentation.
Hence, Manjaro wins the round of User support!
Factor#5: Hardware Resource Needs
This is an important factor if you are planning to employ Linux on a computer with limited hardware resources. This may be an old machine or a new one with less than stellar specs.
The factors you need to be considering include the following
* Category: Lightweight or Middleweight or Heavyweight
* RAM Requirements to have a snappy system &
* Minimum processor requirements
Let’s see how Manjaro and antiX fair up against each other in terms of Hardware resource needs
Manjaro | antiX | |
Category | Lightweight to Middleweight | Lightweight |
Minimum RAM requirements | 1GB | 192MB (Minimum)
256MB (Recommended) |
Minimum Processor Requirements | 1GHz processor | 1GHz processor |
Refer to the article below if you wish to have a look at a step by step guide for choosing a Linux distro for your computer’s specifications.
A Complete Guide For Choosing A Distro For Your Computer’s Specs..!!
The Results!
Let us know go ahead and see the results of our comparison! Have a look at the Bar chart below.
As you can see Manjaro wins in User support.
antiX wins in Hardware support, Hardware Resource needs, and Stability.
There is a tie between the 2 distros in Software Support, and Ease of use.
I suggest you pick the distro that best suits you based on this graph. For example, if hardware support is more important to you, then pick the distro that has better support for your hardware!
Summary
To summarise the article here is the comparison table from the beginning of the blog again.
Manjaro | antiX | |
Organization Name | Manjaro GmbH & Co. KG Organization Type: Company |
antiX is developed by a community, to fulfill the need for a lightweight USB portable and stable distro, capable of running in older hardware.
Organization Type: Community |
Expertise Level Needed | Beginner – Intermediate | Intermediate |
Based On | Arch | Debian |
Target Use-cases | General-purpose Distro.
Best Use-case: best suited for running Windows apps and Games through WINE and proton Other use cases: Arch lovers can get a “prebuilt easy to install” distro |
Specific purpose Distro.
Best Use-case: USB portable Distro Other Use-cases: For use in older hardware |
Software Support | 8/10 Out of the box software: 4/5 Software Repository: 4/5 Since this distro is based on Arch, there is support for all the latest software and kernels. |
8/10 Out of the box software: 4/5 Software Repository: 4/5 |
Hardware Support | 8/10 Official driver support: 3/5 Support for older hardware: 5/5 The user can select whether to use opensource drivers or proprietary drivers at boot-time |
9/10 Official driver support: 4/5 Support for older hardware: 5/5 |
Hardware Resource Needs | middleweight | Lightweight |
Support | 7/10 Paid support: Available in certain areas Community: 3/5 The community will expect you to have a DIY attitude and make an attempt to solve your problems using documentation, before posting in their forums. Documentation: 4/5 Arch documentation is considered to be one of the best in the Linux distro world! |
4/10 Paid support: Not available Community: 2/5 Documentation: 2/5 |
Ease of use | 7/10 Medium | 7/10 Intermediate level |
Stability | 7/10 As long as the best practices are followed the Distro is stable. A tinkering user can break the system if he doesn’t know what he is doing! |
8/10: Very stable
Based on Debian Stable and hence Antix Linux is a very stable distro! |
Release Cycles | Rolling Release cycles: The software packages are constantly upgraded with features and bugs fixes as they become available, so no need to wait for major releases for getting the benefits of new software packages. | Fixed Release
Once a year |
Hope you have got enough data to choose between these 2 amazing distros!
And with that, I will conclude this article!
I hope you guys enjoyed this article and learned something useful.
If you liked the post, feel free to share this post with your friends and colleagues!
Related Articles
Here are some of my other articles that might interest you!
What Is The Best Linux Distro? Analysis & Comparison..!!
A Step By Step Plan To Learn Linux..!
Best Linux Distro For Workstation: Analysis and Comparison!!
A Complete Guide For Choosing A Distro For Your Computer’s Specs..!!
Best Distro For Software And Hardware Support: An Analysis.!!
Distro-Hopping, What, Why & How Explained!
Reasons Behind The Existence of SO MANY Linux Distros: An Analysis!