Credits:
In this article let us have a look at 2 very popular distros MX Linux and KDE Neon and see where each distro shines so that you can pick one that best suit your needs!
For those of you in a hurry, here is the short version of the answer.
The Short Version Of The Answer
What are the differences between MX Linux and KDE Neon? The main difference between MX Linux and KDE Neon is MX Linux is meant for beginners who are looking for the best portable USB distro while KDE Neon is meant for users who love the KDE desktop environment and the stability of Ubuntu
The table below highlights the important differences between the 2 distros
| MX Linux | KDE Neon | |
| Organization Name & Type | Community of MX: former MEPIS users in collaboration with antiX Community (M for MEPIS and X for antiX!)
Organization Type: Online community |
KDE aims to provide the latest KDE plasma and other features on a rock-solid base
Organization Type: Community |
| Expertise Level Needed | Beginner to Intermediate | Beginner |
| Based On | Debian | Ubuntu LTS |
| Target Use-cases | General-purpose Distro.
Best Use-case: USB persistent portable distro Other use cases: Use in a workstation |
General-purpose Distro.
Best Use-case: on use cases that rely on the KDE apps. Other Use-cases: For use in a workstation |
| Software Support | 8/10 Out of the box software: 4/5 Software Repository: 4/5 Since this distro is based on Debian there is a large collection of software in the official repo. |
8/10 Out of the box software: 4/5 Software Repository: 4/5 |
| Hardware Support | 9/10 Official driver support: 4/5 Support for older hardware: 5/5 |
7/10 Official driver support: 4/5 Support for older hardware: 3/5 |
| Hardware Resource Needs | Middleweight | middleweight |
| Support | 6.5/10 Paid support: not available Community: 3.5/5 good Documentation: 3/5 okay documentation, |
8/10 Paid support: available through consultants Community: 4/5 Documentation: 4/5 |
| Ease of use | 8/10: Easy to use | 8/10: Easy
KDE neon is easy to use out of the box with plenty of customization options available |
| Stability | 8/10 Very stable | 7/10: Stable
Based on Ubuntu LTS hence has a very stable base, uncaught bugs can come through the latest KDE latest features though |
| Release Cycles | Fixed Release Schedule: Once a year | Fixed Release
Every 2 years, with KDE updates added all the time. |
The graph below summarizes the table and compares the 2 distros and shows us how they compare with each other on various factors (Higher the points the better that particular feature is in a given distro)
That is just the short version of the answer, let’s go ahead and look at the longer and more informative version and learn more about the similarities and differences between the 2 distros.
The Linux Distributions World
The word Distro is short for “Distribution”. Since the Linux source code is open for everyone to see, large communities started evolving to bring together Operating Systems suited towards specific needs/goals.
These “specific needs/goals” include, but not limited to the following.
* producing documents
* writing programs and creating software
* editing pictures, videos, audio, and multimedia-production related works
* store sensitive information by securing the operating system so that no one can hack into it or just browse the internet and consume media.
Say a community of people just wanted to browse the internet with their computers, then there is no point giving them the software to write programs in. Thus since every community’s needs and goals were different these communities started distributing built images of this operating system with all the essential tools installed. These prebuilt images are called distros!
If you wish to know more about the reason behind the presence of so many choices in the Linux World, I suggest reading the article given below.
Reasons Behind The Existence of SO MANY Linux Distros: An Analysis!
The Main Factors of Comparison
The factors mentioned above are just a small list of 100s of factors that differentiate distros. If you are either switching from some other OS to Linux or you are in the process of choosing your next Linux distro and you are confused which one to choose, you need to have a look at these top 5 decision-making factors
* Factor#1: Good Match with your Particular use-case
* Factor#2: Support for your favorite software
* Factor#3: Hardware Support and Proprietary Driver Support
* Factor#4: Your level of expertise in Linux
* Factor#5: Hardware Resource Needs
I have written a separate article explaining these factors which you can find in the link below
Top 5 Factors To Choose Between Linux Distros!
Let’s have a look at each of these important factors and see how MX Linux and KDE Neon compare against each other.
Factor#1: Good Match with your Particular use-case
By use-case, I mean the type of work you are going to be doing on your computer. The Linux distro world originated because of the difference in use cases.
MX Linux’s goal is wildly different from that of KDE Neon’s.
Let’s have a brief comparison between MX Linux and KDE Neon in terms of goals, target users, and best use cases to employ these distros.
| MX Linux | KDE Neon | |
| Goal | To be an easy to install Debian derivative with USB persistence | To provide the latest KDE plasma and other features on a rock-solid base |
| Target users | Linux Beginners who wish to go as pure Debian as possible, but need an easy to install and already tweaked system. | Desktop users who need the latest KDE features as soon as they are out |
| Best Use-Cases to Employ the Distro | Best Use-case: USB persistence lets you carry around all your OS and apps and files in a USB to help you take it anywhere you need it to!
Other Use-cases: As a workstation as MX Linux is based on Debian Stable branch! |
Best Use-case: on use cases that rely on the KDE apps. Other Use-cases: For use in a workstation |
Factor#2: Support for your favorite software
If your main work involves some specific software or the latest versions of a given software then that becomes a decision-making factor for choosing a Linux Distribution. So before fixing on a given distro, be sure to google if that distro has official support for your main software needs.
The factors you need to be considering include the following
* Out of the Box support: The software that the distro ships with.
* Repository Support: The curated software that is available on the official repos
* Type of release cycle: This decides the trade-off between up-to-date software and stable tested software.
* Availability of Graphical Software managers
* Package manager used: This can decide the ease of which you can install and uninstall software
Let’s see how MX Linux and KDE Neon fair up against each other in the category of Software support
| MX Linux | KDE Neon | |
| Out of the Box Software | 4/5 The regular version comes with all the basic tools needed. |
4/5: Has all the essential apps along with KDE specific apps |
| Repository Support | 4/5 Solid repository support as this distro is based on Debian |
4/5: Since this is based on Ubuntu, you get access to all the software in Ubuntu’s repo! |
| Type of release cycle | Fixed release cycle: once a year | Fixed
Based on the Ubuntu LTS schedule so every 2 years |
| GUI Software Management Tools | MX Package installer GUI tool available for easy installation of software packages | Software Center and Synaptic package manager available |
| Package manager used | APT | Apt and Snappy are used |
The bar chart below summarizes the table above. As you can see, both KDE Neon and MX Linux got the same points in terms of Out of the box software support. Both KDE Neon and MX Linux got the same points in terms of Repository support.
Hence, this round is a tie between KDE Neon and MX Linux!!
Refer to the article below if you wish to learn more about package managers.
A Beginners Introduction To Linux Package managers: apt, yum, dpkg & rpm
Factor#3: Hardware Support and Proprietary Driver Support
Not all Linux distros support proprietary drivers officially. Depending on your computer’s hardware, you may or may not have open-source driver support from the manufacturers. This is especially true for hardware such as graphics cards and network cards. Hence it is a good idea to take “driver support” into consideration while choosing your next distro.
The factors you need to be considering include the following
* Distro’s Policy of use of opensource vs proprietary 3rd party software
* Official driver support by Major Companies
* 3rd party driver support from official repos
* Support for older hardware
| MX Linux | KDE Neon | |
| Distro’s Policy | User-oriented distro so includes some proprietary software out of the box | Proprietary drivers officially supported |
| Official driver support by Major Companies | 4/5: Since this distro is based on Debian, all the official support is also inherited! | 4/5: Being based on Ubuntu LTS, KDE Neon gets all the love that ubuntu gets from hardware manufacturers! |
| 3rd party driver support | Available | 3rd party repos available |
| Support for older hardware | 5/5 Supports both 32 and 64-bit processors and has good driver support for older hardware like network cards and graphics cards. Also supports automatic hardware detection! |
3/5: Ubuntu has dropped support for 32bit processors, hence KDE neon will not work on older machines
|
The bar chart below summarizes the table above. As you can see, both KDE Neon and MX Linux got the same points when it comes to official driver support. MX Linux is better than KDE Neon in terms of support for Older Hardware.
Hence, MX Linux wins the round of Hardware support!
Refer to the article below if you wish to have a look at some of the top distros in terms of hardware support.
Best Distro For Software And Hardware Support: A Comparison!!
Factor#4: Your level of expertise in Linux
Depending on your level of expertise in Linux, the choice of the distro you need will vary. This is because of the following factors
* Ease of use: beginner, intermediate, expert
* Paid customer support: available, not available
* Online community support: great, good, okay, not good, no support
* Available Documentation: Great documentation, Good documentation, Okay documentation, no documentation
Let’s see the level of support available for MX Linux and KDE Neon and see how they compare against each other
| MX Linux | KDE Neon | |
| Ease of Use | Beginner | beginner |
| Paid Customer Support | Not available, hence might not be the best choice for organizations | There is no official support, but the KDE website provides a list of consultants if you wish to hire some specialists. |
| Online Community Support | 3.5/5: Good | 4/5: great, Ubuntu’s community should back you up if you have issues with the Ubuntu base, also KDE has a good vibrant online community if you face any issues with KDE apps |
| Documentation | 3/5 Okay documentation |
4/5 Ubuntu and KDE projects have very good documentation |
The bar chart below summarizes the table above. As you can see, KDE Neon is better than MX Linux in terms of online community support. KDE Neon is better than MX Linux in terms of Documentation.
Hence, KDE Neon wins the round of User support!
Factor#5: Hardware Resource Needs
This is an important factor if you are planning to employ Linux on a computer with limited hardware resources. This may be an old machine or a new one with less than stellar specs.
The factors you need to be considering include the following
* Category: Lightweight or Middleweight or Heavyweight
* RAM Requirements to have a snappy system &
* Minimum processor requirements
Let’s see how MX Linux and KDE Neon fair up against each other in terms of Hardware resource needs
| MX Linux | KDE Neon | |
| Category | Middleweight |
Middleweight |
| Minimum RAM requirements | 1GB | 4GB |
| Minimum Processor Requirements | A modern i686 Intel or AMD processor | 2GHz dual-core processor |
Refer to the article below if you wish to have a look at a step by step guide for choosing a Linux distro for your computer’s specifications.
A Complete Guide For Choosing A Distro For Your Computer’s Specs..!!
The Results!
Let us know go ahead and see the results of our comparison! Have a look at the Bar chart below.
As you can see MX Linux wins in Hardware support, Hardware Resource needs, and Stability.
KDE Neon wins in User support.
There is a tie between the 2 distros in Software Support, and Ease of use.
I suggest you pick the distro that best suits you based on this graph. For example, if hardware support is more important to you, then pick the distro that has better support for your hardware!
Summary
To summarise the article here is the comparison table from the beginning of the blog again.
| MX Linux | KDE Neon | |
| Organization Name & Type | Community of MX: former MEPIS users in collaboration with antiX Community (M for MEPIS and X for antiX!)
Organization Type: Online community |
KDE aims to provide the latest KDE plasma and other features on a rock-solid base
Organization Type: Community |
| Expertise Level Needed | Beginner to Intermediate | Beginner |
| Based On | Debian | Ubuntu LTS |
| Target Use-cases | General-purpose Distro.
Best Use-case: USB persistent portable distro Other use cases: Use in a workstation |
General-purpose Distro.
Best Use-case: on use cases that rely on the KDE apps. Other Use-cases: For use in a workstation |
| Software Support | 8/10 Out of the box software: 4/5 Software Repository: 4/5 Since this distro is based on Debian there is a large collection of software in the official repo. |
8/10 Out of the box software: 4/5 Software Repository: 4/5 |
| Hardware Support | 9/10 Official driver support: 4/5 Support for older hardware: 5/5 |
7/10 Official driver support: 4/5 Support for older hardware: 3/5 |
| Hardware Resource Needs | Middleweight | middleweight |
| Support | 6.5/10 Paid support: not available Community: 3.5/5 good Documentation: 3/5 okay documentation, |
8/10 Paid support: available through consultants Community: 4/5 Documentation: 4/5 |
| Ease of use | 8/10: Easy to use | 8/10: Easy
KDE neon is easy to use out of the box with plenty of customization options available |
| Stability | 8/10 Very stable | 7/10: Stable
Based on Ubuntu LTS hence has a very stable base, uncaught bugs can come through the latest KDE latest features though |
| Release Cycles | Fixed Release Schedule: Once a year | Fixed Release
Every 2 years, with KDE updates added all the time. |
Hope you have got enough data to choose between these 2 amazing distros!
And with that, I will conclude this article!
I hope you guys enjoyed this article and learned something useful.
If you liked the post, feel free to share this post with your friends and colleagues!
Related Articles
Here are some of my other articles that might interest you!
What Is The Best Linux Distro? Analysis & Comparison..!!
A Step By Step Plan To Learn Linux..!
Best Linux Distro For Workstation: Analysis and Comparison!!
A Complete Guide For Choosing A Distro For Your Computer’s Specs..!!
Best Distro For Software And Hardware Support: An Analysis.!!
Distro-Hopping, What, Why & How Explained!
Reasons Behind The Existence of SO MANY Linux Distros: An Analysis!
