Credits:
In this article let us have a look at 2 very popular distros Debian and KDE Neon and see where each distro shines so that you can pick one that best suit your needs!
For those of you in a hurry, here is the short version of the answer.
The Short Version Of The Answer
What are the differences between Debian and KDE Neon? The main difference between Debian and KDE Neon is Debian is meant for users who are looking for a stable distro that has the best software and hardware support while KDE Neon is meant for users who love the KDE desktop environment and the stability of Ubuntu
The table below highlights the important differences between the 2 distros
Debian | KDE Neon | |
Organization Name | Debian is one of the oldest and grandest distros available with one of the largest online communities and this is the most-forked distro in the world!
Organization Type: Community |
KDE aims to provide the latest KDE plasma and other features on a rock-solid base
Organization Type: Community |
Expertise Level Needed | Intermediate | Beginner |
Based On | This is an original distro! | Ubuntu LTS |
Target Use-cases | General-purpose Distro
Best Use-case: For use in workstations, ARM-based systems, older hardware Other use cases: Debian has flavors/versions available for almost any kind of use case! |
General-purpose Distro.
Best Use-case: on use cases that rely on the KDE apps. Other Use-cases: For use in a workstation |
Software Support | 10/10 Out of the box software: 5/5 Software Repository: 5/5 Has the biggest collection of software in their official repos with over 59000 packages! |
8/10 Out of the box software: 4/5 Software Repository: 4/5 |
Hardware Support | 9.5/10 Official driver support: 4.5/5 Support for older hardware: 5/5 Supports multiple processor architectures Has proprietary drivers and open-source drivers available. Can support very old hardware. |
7/10 Official driver support: 4/5 Support for older hardware: 3/5 |
Hardware Resource Needs | Middleweight to heavyweight based on the version you choose. | middleweight |
Support | 9.5/10 Paid support: Consultants can be hired Community: 5/5 email lists and online chatting support platforms Documentation: 4.5/5 Very comprehensive online documentation |
8/10 Paid support: available through consultants Community: 4/5 Documentation: 4/5 |
Ease of use | 6/10 Medium
Best suited for intermediate users. |
8/10: Easy
KDE neon is easy to use out of the box with plenty of customization options available |
Stability | 10/10 Very stable
The main focus of Debian is stability and this distro is known for its rock-hard stability! |
7/10: Stable
Based on Ubuntu LTS hence has a very stable base, uncaught bugs can come through the latest KDE latest features though |
Release Cycles | Fixed Release: Once 2 years | Fixed Release
Every 2 years, with KDE updates being added all the time. |
The graph below summarizes the table and compares the 2 distros and shows us how they compare with each other on various factors (Higher the points the better that particular feature is in a given distro)
That is just the short version of the answer, let’s go ahead and look at the longer and more informative version and learn more about the similarities and differences between the 2 distros.
The Linux Distributions World
The word Distro is short for “Distribution”. Since the Linux source code is open for everyone to see, large communities started evolving to bring together Operating Systems suited towards specific needs/goals.
These “specific needs/goals” include, but not limited to the following.
- producing documents
- writing programs and creating software
- editing pictures, videos, audio and multimedia-production related works
- store sensitive information by securing the operating system so that no one can hack into it or
- just browse the internet and consume media.
Say a community of people just wanted to browse the internet with their computers, then there is no point giving them the software to write programs in. Thus since every community’s needs and goals were different these communities started distributing built images of this operating system with all the essential tools installed. These prebuilt images are called distros!
If you wish to know more about the reason behind the presence of so many choices in the Linux World, I suggest reading the article given below.
Reasons Behind The Existence of SO MANY Linux Distros: An Analysis!
The Main Factors of Comparison
The factors mentioned above are just a small list of 100s of factors that differentiate distros. If you are either switching from some other OS to Linux or you are in the process of choosing your next Linux distro and you are confused which one to choose, you need to have a look at these top 5 decision-making factors
- Factor#1: Good Match with your Particular use-case
- Factor#2: Support for your favorite software
- Factor#3: Hardware Support and Proprietary Driver Support
- Factor#4: Your level of expertise in Linux
* Factor#5: Hardware Resource Needs
I have written a separate article explaining these factors which you can find in the link below
Top 5 Factors To Choose Between Linux Distros!
Let’s have a look at each of these important factors and see how Debian and KDE Neon compare against each other.
Factor#1: Good Match with your Particular use-case
By use-case, I mean the type of work you are going to be doing on your computer. The Linux distro world originated because of the difference in use cases.
Debian’s goal is wildly different from that of KDE Neon’s.
Let’s have a brief comparison between Debian and KDE Neon in terms of goals, target users, and best use cases to employ these distros.
Debian | KDE Neon | |
Goal | To create a free operating system that can be installed in almost any hardware with a strong focus on stability | To provide the latest KDE plasma and other features on a rock-solid base |
Target users | Intermediate users who need an original Linux distro with the most supported software packages and processor architectures. | Desktop users who need the latest KDE features as soon as they are out |
Best Use-Cases to Employ the Distro | General-purpose Distro
Best Use-case: For use in workstations, ARM-based systems, older hardware Other use cases: Debian has flavors/versions available for almost any kind of use case! |
Best Use-case: on use cases that rely on the KDE apps. Other Use-cases: For use in a workstation |
Factor#2: Support for your favorite software
If your main work involves some specific software or the latest versions of a given software then that becomes a decision-making factor for choosing a Linux Distribution. So before fixing on a given distro, be sure to google if that distro has official support for your main software needs.
The factors you need to be considering include the following
- Out of the Box support: The software that the distro ships with.
- Repository Support: The curated software that is available on the official repos
- Type of release cycle: This decides the trade-off between up-to-date software and stable tested software.
- Availability of Graphical Software managers
- Package manager used: This can decide the ease of which you can install and uninstall software
Let’s see how Debian and KDE Neon fair up against each other in the category of Software support
Debian | KDE Neon | |
Out of the Box Software | 5/5: You can download a complete image with the most software packages! | 4/5: Has all the essential apps along with KDE specific apps |
Repository Support | 5/5: Has the biggest collection of software in their official repos with over 59000 packages! | 4/5: Since this is based on Ubuntu, you get access to all the software in Ubuntu’s repo! |
Type of release cycle | Fixed Release: Once 2 years | Fixed
Based on the Ubuntu LTS schedule so every 2 years |
GUI Software Management Tools | Available: We can use the Synaptic Package Manager or GNOME Software Centre. | Software Center and Synaptic package manager available |
Package manager used | Apt package manager | Apt and Snappy are used |
The bar chart below summarizes the table above. As you can see, Debian is better than KDE Neon in terms of Out of the box software support. Debian is better than KDE Neon in terms of Repository support.
Hence, Debian wins the round of Software support!
Refer to the article below if you wish to learn more about package managers.
A Beginners Introduction To Linux Package managers: apt, yum, dpkg & rpm
Factor#3: Hardware Support and Proprietary Driver Support
Not all Linux distros support proprietary drivers officially. Depending on your computer’s hardware, you may or may not have open-source driver support from the manufacturers. This is especially true for hardware such as graphics cards and network cards. Hence it is a good idea to take “driver support” into consideration while choosing your next distro.
The factors you need to be considering include the following
- Distro’s Policy of use of opensource vs proprietary 3rd party software
- Official driver support by Major Companies
- 3rd party driver support from official repos
- Support for older hardware
Debian | KDE Neon | |
Distro’s Policy | User-focused distro: Proprietary drivers officially supported | Proprietary drivers officially supported |
Official driver support by Major Companies | 4.5/5: Being one of the oldest and most forked distros, most companies provide .deb packages | 4/5: Being based on Ubuntu LTS, KDE Neon gets all the love that ubuntu gets from hardware manufacturers! |
3rd party driver support | 3rd party repos available | 3rd party repos available |
Support for older hardware | 5/5 Supports multiple processor architectures Has proprietary drivers and open-source drivers available. Can support very old hardware |
3/5: Ubuntu has dropped support for 32bit processors, hence KDE neon will not work on older machines
|
The bar chart below summarizes the table above. As you can see, Debian is better than KDE Neon when it comes to official driver support. Debian is better than KDE Neon in terms of support for Older Hardware.
Hence, Debian wins the round of Hardware support!
Refer to the article below if you wish to have a look at some of the top distros in terms of hardware support.
Best Distro For Software And Hardware Support: A Comparison!!
Factor#4: Your level of expertise in Linux
Depending on your level of expertise in Linux, the choice of the distro you need will vary. This is because of the following factors
- Ease of use: beginner, intermediate, expert
- Paid customer support: available, not available
- Online community support: great, good, okay, not good, no support
- Available Documentation: Great documentation, Good documentation, Okay documentation, no documentation
Let’s see the level of support available for Debian and KDE Neon and see how they compare against each other
Debian | KDE Neon | |
Ease of Use | Intermediate level of expertise needed. | beginner |
Paid Customer Support | Consultants can be hired if needed |
There is no official support, but the KDE website provides a list of consultants if you wish to hire some specialists. |
Online Community Support | 3/5: email lists and online chatting support platforms | 4/5: great, Ubuntu’s community should back you up if you have issues with the Ubuntu base, also KDE has a good vibrant online community if you face any issues with KDE apps |
Documentation | 4/5: Very comprehensive online documentation | 4/5 Ubuntu and KDE projects have very good documentation |
The bar chart below summarizes the table above. As you can see, Debian is better than KDE Neon in terms of online community support. Debian is better than KDE Neon in terms of Documentation.
Hence, Debian wins the round of User support!
Factor#5: Hardware Resource Needs
This is an important factor if you are planning to employ Linux on a computer with limited hardware resources. This may be an old machine or a new one with less than stellar specs.
The factors you need to be considering include the following
- Category: Lightweight or Middleweight or Heavyweight
- RAM Requirements to have a snappy system &
- Minimum processor requirements
Let’s see how Debian and KDE Neon fair up against each other in terms of Hardware resource needs
Debian | KDE Neon | |
Category | Middleweight to heavyweight based on the version you choose. | Middleweight |
Minimum RAM requirements | 1GB (2GB recommended) | 4GB |
Minimum Processor Requirements | 1GHz Dual-core processor | 2GHz dual-core processor |
Refer to the article below if you wish to have a look at a step by step guide for choosing a Linux distro for your computer’s specifications.
A Complete Guide For Choosing A Distro For Your Computer’s Specs..!!
The Results!
Let us know go ahead and see the results of our comparison! Have a look at the Bar chart below.
As you can see Debian wins in Software support, Hardware support, Hardware Resource needs, User support, and Stability.
KDE Neon wins in Ease of use.
I suggest you pick the distro that best suits you based on this graph. For example, if hardware support is more important to you, then pick the distro that has better support for your hardware!
Summary
To summarise the article here is the comparison table from the beginning of the blog again.
Debian | KDE Neon | |
Organization Name | Debian is one of the oldest and grandest distros available with one of the largest online communities and this is the most-forked distro in the world!
Organization Type: Community |
KDE aims to provide the latest KDE plasma and other features on a rock-solid base
Organization Type: Community |
Expertise Level Needed | Intermediate | Beginner |
Based On | This is an original distro! | Ubuntu LTS |
Target Use-cases | General-purpose Distro
Best Use-case: For use in workstations, ARM-based systems, older hardware Other use cases: Debian has flavors/versions available for almost any kind of use case! |
General-purpose Distro.
Best Use-case: on use cases that rely on the KDE apps. Other Use-cases: For use in a workstation |
Software Support | 10/10 Out of the box software: 5/5 Software Repository: 5/5 Has the biggest collection of software in their official repos with over 59000 packages! |
8/10 Out of the box software: 4/5 Software Repository: 4/5 |
Hardware Support | 9.5/10 Official driver support: 4.5/5 Support for older hardware: 5/5 Supports multiple processor architectures Has proprietary drivers and open-source drivers available. Can support very old hardware. |
7/10 Official driver support: 4/5 Support for older hardware: 3/5 |
Hardware Resource Needs | Middleweight to heavyweight based on the version you choose. | middleweight |
Support | 9.5/10 Paid support: Consultants can be hired Community: 5/5 email lists and online chatting support platforms Documentation: 4.5/5 Very comprehensive online documentation |
8/10 Paid support: available through consultants Community: 4/5 Documentation: 4/5 |
Ease of use | 6/10 Medium
Best suited for intermediate users. |
8/10: Easy
KDE neon is easy to use out of the box with plenty of customization options available |
Stability | 10/10 Very stable
The main focus of Debian is stability and this distro is known for its rock-hard stability! |
7/10: Stable
Based on Ubuntu LTS hence has a very stable base, uncaught bugs can come through the latest KDE latest features though |
Release Cycles | Fixed Release: Once 2 years | Fixed Release
Every 2 years, with KDE updates being added all the time. |
Hope you have got enough data to choose between these 2 amazing distros!
And with that, I will conclude this article!
I hope you guys enjoyed this article and learned something useful.
If you liked the post, feel free to share this post with your friends and colleagues!
Related Articles
Here are some of my other articles that might interest you!
What Is The Best Linux Distro? Analysis & Comparison..!!
A Step By Step Plan To Learn Linux..!
Best Linux Distro For Workstation: Analysis and Comparison!!
A Complete Guide For Choosing A Distro For Your Computer’s Specs..!!
Best Distro For Software And Hardware Support: An Analysis.!!
Distro-Hopping, What, Why & How Explained!
Reasons Behind The Existence of SO MANY Linux Distros: An Analysis!